I have a question: is our company allowed to participate in the tender for only one of the three use cases included in the preliminary documents? I couldn’t find this information in the tender details.

Are the €90,000 per contractor intended for all three use cases? Or would it still apply if we submit only one use case?

Hello,

May I know if some part of the results of the project (software) may be disclosed under an open-source license?

Regards,

For the “open, standards-based architecture” (A.1.6), are there specific European interoperability standards or data models the PBG expects the solution to comply with (e.g. OGC, CAP for alerting, MQTT/DDS, NIEMstyle schemas, relevant STANAGs)?

TD1 states that site visits will be organised prior to the Phase 3 on-site testing. Given that Phase 1 (3 months) requires a complete architecture and design, will tenderers have any opportunity to access site information, surveys or a familiarisation visit before or during Phase 1, rather than only before Phase 3?

Annex III restricts the SNCF video dataset to Phase 3 and to anonymised/consented data. Will any representative datasets (video, sensor data, floor plans) be made available during Phases 1–2 for design and prototype training?

Good afternoon,

I have collected a few questions before the deadline ends.

1.Given the GDPR and data segregation constraints, will the buyers provide anonymized, pre-recorded operational datasets (e.g., CCTV feeds from the stadiums) during Phase 1 and 2 to allow accurate calibration of the video and behavioural analytics engines prior to live deployment?
2. The Annex V pilot descriptions for both Spain (Metropolitano) and France (Gare du Nord) specify "No access to Internet or any external network" for the installation and testing. Does this mandate a 100% on-premise, edge-computing architecture for the entire platform, strictly prohibiting any reliance on external cloud-based processing or external AI modules?
3. Requirements mandate that contractors supply, install, and retain ownership of all hardware for Phase 2 and Phase 3. Are contractors expected to physically relocate the hardware used during Phase 2 at the testing lab to the Phase 3 operational sites, or must we budget for separate, parallel hardware setups?
4. The Phase 2 and Phase 3 financial estimates submitted in Envelope C during Phase 1 will act as a binding maximum cap?
5. For a consortium submission involving multiple partners with distinct software contributions, should this discount be presented as a single aggregated percentage for the entire platform, or must each partner break down their individual IPR discount item-by-item?